FIN 220 Unit 3

RICHARD DIEBENKORN – Artist Research

“Ingleside”, 1963. Oil on canvas, 81 3/4 x 69 1/2
“Invented Landscape”, 1977. Gouache and crayon on paper, 17 x 14.

FINAL PAINTING

Initial drawing done with a black, acrylic marker. In emulating Diebenkorn, I made no attempt to hide these black marks, nor any adjacent white, so they would to some effect outline the various sections I had taped off.
I taped off just about every contained section or segment of this painting, so the black outlines could be at least partially preserved by taping over them.
I ultimately used the Cad Red Medium and Quinacradone Magenta with varying amounts of Titanium White for the red house. I added some Sap Green to make some of the darker shingles on the red house. For the blue house, I used Ultramarine Blue and Payne’s Grey with Titanium White.
“First and Derwent”, 2022.

My original goal with this painting was to produce something like one of the Group of Seven house landscapes, and I do find this reminiscent of LL Fitzgerald’s “Doc Snyder’s House”, 1931, as unintentional as that was. However, the more I read about Diebenkorn, the more I tried to incorporate his techniques, especially the use of sections and segments, and the imprecise, thin outlines of black that he used so much.

Everything peripheral here (sky, trees, fence and grass), and the roofs were done with drywall scrapers. The central parts are more detailed, and the ‘give’ of the canvas centrally didn’t lend itself to the use of scrapers. Hence, the style peripherally and centrally look different from one another. The trim on the two houses was difficult to decide on. The yellowish white on the blue house seemed like a good choice, but it ended too close to the yellow oxide-white I used on the red house. I would have liked them to differ more.

VAL NELSON Commentary

3 Life Paintings

20 x 26 inches
20 x 26 inches
24 x 36 inches

FIN 220 Unit 2

STILL LIFE

In the end, I included the orange insert through which the blade protrudes. It would break up the monotony or homogeneity of the negative space and improve the pairing of the blues and the oranges.

Still life set-up. Powerful lamp/spotlight created the main shadows. Viewfinder/frame was secured in place, so I could use the same markers and reference points every time I went back to it. I put the fluorescent yellow glasses strap in the recess in the fence so I could paint the shadows as if there was no recess.

My whole set-up. Going back to the viewfinder every time I needed to refresh my view quickly became very tedious and time consuming. In the end, I relied much more on photographs.

View through the cardboard frame/viewfinder. This wasn’t the one I ultimately used, but not far off.

Table Saw #1

Dry brushing throughout, except for the facial features. On phthalo turquoise underpainting, which remains a significant feature of the painting. Smaller details were harder to dry brush and I’m sure I wasn’t dry brushing some of those parts. Still, I think the overall dry brushing effect is obvious.

Table Saw #2

Monochromatic with Payne’s Grey. Except for the few facial features, this was all done with drywall scrapers and palette knives. I enjoy this technique: it’s very much like sculpting and it forces me away from that tight, controlled technique I’m so used to using. It also doesn’t lend itself to small detail, but as I look back on it, maybe that forces me to loosen up more and I think the result is effective.

No underpainting used. Saw blade perspective is off a bit.

Table Saw #3

Commentary: My goal with these pieces was to force myself to try looser techniques and compare that to my usual tighter and detailed style, as with this third painting. I enjoyed using the scrapers the most, and I think this could be a very effective technique with a larger piece. I also wanted to make a piece that was quirky and perhaps humorous, not intending any meaning other than that.

FIN 220 Unit 1

Artist Research

SIGMAR POLKE (1941-2010)

-German painter and photographer who ‘came of age’ in the 1960’s

-the founder of the ‘Capitalist Realism’ style of painting with Gerhard Richter in 1963

-post-war West Germany’s answer to the influence of American and British pop art, as Germany sought to redefine its identity after the years of Nazism

-Polke appropriated the style of others’ work, and wasn’t above using the actual works of others

-parodies/commentaries on consumer society, post-war Germany, and classic artistic conventions  -also parodied the ‘Socialist Realism’ style of art that had become so prevalent in the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence

-idiosyncratic and irreverent  -used images and ideas that amused him, seemingly without much thought as to what the viewer might think

“Girlfriends” (1965/66). Offset lithograph, 47 x 59 cm. From moma.org

-my first impression is of a very pop art feel to it with the cartoon-like images and the dotted effect of commercial newsprint, not unlike what Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein were producing at this time  -the eyes are striking and my line of vision works back and forth between the two pairs of eyes, so it’s rather captivating that way

-the title seems appropriate; they look like they could be good friends -they look confident and both stare straight back at the viewer   -in terms of the subject matter it is otherwise unremarkable

-there are some strong elements to the design, especially the contrast of the eyes, the linear movement of the bodies and arms around the work, and the overall composition, but you can’t credit Polke with these elements, as they are actually the work of the original photographer  -what Polke contributed was the emphasis on the process, the dotted effect as we are familiar with in newsprint and comic books

-abstract elements in the background -the figures are representational, but with the dotted effect they are tending towards the abstract

Detail from “Girlfriends” (1965/66). From: Pinterest.com

“The Couple” (1965). Oil on canvas, 40 x 53.6cm. From: Christies.com

-doesn’t have the pop art feel of the above painting, though I think it is Polke’s comment on the dotted effect of that genre -he’s taken it to an extreme, almost to the point that the two figures are unrecognizable; it’s very near to abstract, though the subject matter becomes clearer the further away from it you view it

-the title definitely helps the viewer, but doesn’t add much more than that. -they look dressed up, but there are not many other clues to the context

-perhaps this is the irreverent Polke, making the dotted effect the most prominent part of the painting, while the figures are hardly relevant  -he did this using a pencil eraser to apply his paint

 

“Supermarkets” (1976). Gouache, acrylic, goldbronze, felt-tip pen, and paper collage on canvas, 207 x 295 cm. From: folksonomy.co

-this really feels like more traditional pop art with the multiple Supermans caught in various poses as they shop in the supermarket -lots of colour and numerous other figures filling the spaces around the painting

-it is a busy and chaotic composition, which gives this work a tension that I don’t really like   -the busyness and tension are accentuated by the one point perspective, which draws you right in to the centre of the work  -it feels then like you are trapped there and there is no escape  

-perhaps this work is meant to show the capitalism to which Polke alludes in his ‘Capitalist Realism’ genre  -Polke wasn’t against capitalism; he was quite in favour of it, his family having escaped from communist East Germany in 1953 to end up in West Germany                -however, Polke is not above poking fun at the elements he thinks are deserving of such parody

-an interesting painting, but not one I enjoy viewing for very long

“The Illusionist” (2007). Mixed media on fabric, 220 x 300 cm. From: irequireart.com

-another full canvas, but the elements here are more discernible and easier to digest  -that doesn’t mean I understood it any better, in fact I make less sense of what Polke’s point is here than in his other works  -the illusionists and the blindfolded subject are straightforward enough, and the framing curtain suggests they are on a stage  -but what of these various angels and devils, the elements of good and evil

-this work has an older, classical illustrative style about it with its fine and precise lines, while the upper parts suggest to me earlier Christian art  -if you think of it as the older piece that Polke was trying to convey, then the good and bad elements seem more appropriate, as magic and illusion have been thought of as evil at times in the past

DAVID SALLE (b. 1952)

-an American artist in the Neo-expressionism and Postmodernism styles

-his works tend to marry traditional (and often appropriated e.g. Disney and pieces from art history) figures with his own original elements  -many of his works consist of juxtaposed images of both abstract and human figure form

-Salle’s intent is to eliminate the narrative element in his works  -he often starts with one image or figure and gradually adds others to it, cross-referencing them with one another in complex ways  -his critics doubt he is as intentional as that; they have described Salle’s work as random and incoherent, as if he is putting various elements together with no real purpose in mind

“Sextant in Dogtown” (1987). Oil & acrylic on canvas, 96 x 124 inches. From: davidsallestudio.net

-top row of clownish, male figures, two of them laughing or jeering, the third dressed in old naval garb, holding a sextant -these are juxtaposed with the three headless and barely dressed female figures in the bottom row -the black and white female drawings are starker and more realistic, suggestive of the trapped and perhaps coerced situations in which they find themselves

-the contrast between the two rows is striking, as if the male figures freely enjoy themselves, while the female figures are trapped in servitude

-if the sextant represents navigation, is Salle saying we have lost our way and need better direction

-I don’t understand the knotted element to the left of the sextant nor the bird inset in the row of female figures

“The Flagrant Eyeball” (1987). Acrylic, charcoal &oil on canvas, 60 x 114 inches. From: mutualart.com

-this work is more straightforward -the male brain is hardwired to the sexual objectification of women and the consumption of these images -this man looks mesmerized, as if in an automaton-like state -he’s captivated and can’t stop looking at these images, thus presumably the title for this work

-again, you have a coloured panel juxtaposed with the black and white female image, which in this case is overlaid with sexual drawings and the flagrant eyeball

“Tragedy” (1995). Oil & acrylic on two canvas panels, 96 x 144 inches. From: the broad.org

-I had much less success getting any understanding of what Salle is trying to do here -the figure on the right in his two different poses appears to be experiencing some sort of medical ‘tragedy’, as suggested by his saddened expression and the IV bag -the more colourful panel on the left is focussed on a photo of a large bomb going off, a tragedy in itself, but how does this relate to the surrounding lemons and the furnished rooms

-is the man in the right panel’s situation a result of the perhaps atomic explosion on the left?  -numerous images, objects and elements here that I don’t understand  -maybe his critics have a point

“Verdi with Blue Background” (2020). Archival pigment ink on fine art paper, 58 x 42 inches. From: artnet.com

-from a recent series of portraits done by Salle

-so much conveyed with such simple lines and different value areas  -not much attempt at gradual transitioning between the value shapes

-a very effective portrait  -somewhat cartoon-like, perhaps suggestive of pop art, but I think it stands on its own as an effective portrait

Technique Exploration

Background- wet wash on wet for gradation.

Scumbling for trees. String in paint bottom right. Glaze used to affix paper punched fruit in tree. Glaze could used to affix almost anything.

Stippling applied with pencil eraser and paint brush comb. Circles applied with bottle lid.

Sgraffito- cadmium red medium underpainting with Payne’s grey on top, palette knife and drywall scraper as tools, Hansa yellow medium applied to some sgraffito areas after drying. Note how wiped off yellow paint shows up in the brush strokes of underlying top coat.

Various sgraffito methods to a very thick top coat, then different paints applied to the sgraffito areas once dry and wiped clean to see if paint would remain in the depressions formed by the sgraffito. Note fern-like effect in top right hand corner from dragging sgraffito tool through topcoat that had already started to dry.

Stippling applied with pencil eraser.

Wet wash painting of same mug as above. Numerous clear gloss glaze coats applied to just the mug, but it didn’t seem to change the effect at all.

Dry brushing.

High contrast background to objects.

Sgraffito drawing.

Applied with drywall scraper. Some impasto effect.

Green glaze applied to right hand side, also picked up some nearly dry darker paint with the initial yellow dry brushing.

Wet wash self-portrait.

Painting #1 – “Scraper additive” – Some background brushed underpainting, but everything else was applied by scraper or palette knife.

Painting #2- “Scraper subtractive” – Payne’s grey underpainting, cadmium red medium and extender top coat. All marks made with a variety of scrapers and palette knives, and a pen cap for the irises.

Analysis of Style Painting

Composition and perspective drawings.

Slide from which image was transposed.
Initial composition with slide projection added.
Cropped to give the two foreground figures more prominence.

Submitted for critique. Chiaroscuro effect didn’t work out as I anticipated. Some differentiation between light and dark areas, but this was more a result of saturation levels rather than true dark and light.

Techniques used: scraping/sgraffito down to different coloured underpainting, sponging, lots of dry brushing and scumbling, black lines applied by scraper, glazing with darker hues to darken some of the non-foreground parts.

I’m pleased I got this done in the limited time I used. I’m becoming more comfortable letting ‘impressions’ of objects stand rather than worrying about finely detailing down to a more realistic appearance. Five figures was a lot, but they came fairly easily. Many details I didn’t attend to that would have improved the painting, but I had spent enough time on it already.

After critique with some adjustments made. I don’t think this painting excited anyone but me. (That includes family members, which is never a good sign for me.) I’m sure this reflects the very personal nature of the painting and its underlying emotions. Is it my goal to excite others with my painting? Maybe not, but it is rewarding when it happens. Nonetheless, I can feel the progress I’m making.

I like the slide projection aspect of this and would use it again, but I’m the only one who saw it used, so I don’t think the significance of it is appreciated by anyone but me. Again, quite personal and not something that is going to be noted by the average viewer.